Archive for August, 2010

30JulSubmission is Not a Dirty Word (Part 1)

John Sweetman
When I first went to theological college (as a 25 year old), we always addressed our lecturers by their titles and stood up when they entered the room. There were numerous rules about what you could wear, when you had to study, and what you could do with your free time.

Thankfully, times have changed. As a principal, I would prefer to spend time mentoring students, than checking that they're studying at their desk at 8.00pm. These days personal freedom is prized and institutions and rules are regarded with suspicion. We’ve learned a lot about grace and trust in the last 50 years. We’re sensitive to the dangers of power.

But what happens when you as a leader find yourself being asked to conform or submit? The challenge could come from a difficult supervisor, an antiquated church system, an obstinate partner, an unsympathetic team leader, or some set of rules or regulations.

You're wanting to try something new in ministry or business and your leader says, "No." You don't want to run a program, but you are told that you must. You have vision that keeps getting blocked by the organisation. You are told to change a behaviour that you think is perfectly appropriate. The list goes on.

Many young leaders feel that submission is a dirty word; that it shows lack of character and backbone. They think that when you submit, you are giving up your ideals and freedom; that you are better off walking away than weakly yielding.

I'm sympathetic, but I believe this is a huge and dangerous mistake. Here's my mantra (that's probably not the best word to use): "You cannot have spiritual authority if you cannot submit to spiritual authority."

Okay I belong to a different generation, but don't write me off just yet. I'll try to explain and justify this fundamental leadership principle next week.

30JulViews on Missional Churches (Part 2)

Steve Drinkall
(Note: The picture here is actually of the band Rhubarb. You might remember that they won Triple J's Unearthed and had the hit 'Exerciser'. Steve is in the front. He was the lead singer).

I have had the privilege of working as a staff member in the church and also as a staff member at many pubs around Brisbane. My experience is that the people are basically the same. All of us have hang ups, insecurities, addictions of various sorts, doubts and even a considerable amount of faith at various times. The only difference is that some of us have found grace.

As Michael Frost says so eloquently, "We are all beggars, its just that some of us have found where to get bread". In that context its makes perfect sense that we should orient our lives and activities around sharing that Good News with all beggars. Conversely, it makes less sense to sit in the church and postulate about how we should go out and tell them. Theorizing about which methodology is superior seems to me unhelpful.

I suspect that following Jesus requires us to dine with sinners a bit more than some of us are comfortable with…

Missional churches are simply christian communities who actively train their people to play the real game of coming alongside sinners in order to point them towards Jesus…maybe I'm too simplistic.

Steve is currently on staff of a missional church called Pathway.

26JulViews on Missional Churches (Part 1)

Mark Broadbent

I am part of a group of young pastors who meet once a month to discuss leadership issues as they apply to the church. Today we looked at the topic of 'missional leadership'. Many different ideas were tossed around. Some I agreed with, some I didn't.

But it did raise the question: What does it mean to be a missional church?

Consider some recent quotes by Erwin McManus

"Mission is why the Church exists".

"At Mosaic we don't have members, only missionaries. There is nothing to join except a community on mission".

"There is an army of cross cultural missionaries who have become the new leaders of the church. Their calling isn't to pastor churches that focus on the happiness of its members, but to mobilize the church for the purpose of fulfilling God's mission of reconciling the world to Him"

Do you agree with McManus???

Leave a comment and share you thoughts…

23JulneoLeader Update

neoLeader weekly emails
We have now been sending out the neoLeader email for about 4 months! During that time there have been numerous leadership articles written by myself and some of our other contributors including Jenny Dobbin, Helen Bates, and John Robertson.  

We have also profiled some effective younger leaders including Wes Jessop, Billy Williams, Steve Drinkall and Nathan Harris.

neoLeader site
Lots of people have been visiting the neoLeader site (neoLeader.org), reading the articles and using the links to challenging podcasts. Some have also been interacting with the blog. For example, a recent controversial article on alcohol stirred up an interesting debate.

Feedback
It's only early days and there is so much we would still like to develop, but we are really interested in any feedback. What do you like? How could the email and website be improved to help you more as a leader? What issues would you like us to tackle?

You can reply to this email or leave a comment on the website.

Our heart
I believe that the development of strong young Christian leaders is essential to the growth of God's kingdom. God is calling young adults to the challenging and exciting task of forging a new generation of disciples. We want to assist and support these new leaders.

John Sweetman (for the neoLeader team)

19JulPeople Priority (Part 2)

John Robertson

Last week John spoke about the leadership lessons he learned in India. The first was the priority of people in ministry. People are not the means to the end, they are the end. here is the rest of his article.

John RobertsonThe second issue for me is how this article started. I need people who I can trust and be prepared to be open and vulnerable with. If we fail to bring friends around us, who really know us, who know about our weaknesses and potential areas of temptation and sin, we will eventually be rendered ineffective in our ministry. After a while of not opening up to people we can easily start to segment an unhealthy area of our life and believe that it won't have an effect on our ministry. This duality of life creates such a dissonance in our thoughts that we will either fall big time, or go crazy trying to cope with the Dr Jeckell/Mr Hyde lifestyle.

To counteract this I have two forms of accountability outside of my church's structure. One is a prayer and accountability group of three other guys who I do breakfast with every week. The other is a peer in another church who I have a close relationship with. Both of these groups ask me the hard questions and bring me back to earth.

If we are to be effective leaders over the long haul we must decrease the loneliness at the top by taking the risk of being appropriately vulnerable with a few selected others, as well as maintain our focus on the end result of ministry – people!

19JulForgotten Ways (Part 6)

A book review by Scott McKnight

Alan Hirsch has a mission himself: to inspire Christians and churches around the globe to become missional. His book, The Forgotten Ways, traces the DNA of missional churches (mDNA). We've looked at two of the six ingredients – the centrality of Jesus and a focus on disciple-making – and today we look at #3.

Missional-incarnational impulse. The word "missional" has become the darling for many, and I want to go on record here that I think this term is worth sticking on your desk to remind of what is important.

What is it? Essentially "an outwardly bound movement from one community or individual to another… a genuine missional impulse is a sending rather than attractional one" (129).

Is your church missional? Why or why not? What can we do to create more missional churches? I might ask it this way: How local is your church? Or is it just like the other churches of your denomination that happens to meet in your community? How many ministries do you have at your church that are specific to your community? Have you tried to "apply" things that work elsewhere to your community – work or not?

The attractional model is what he says characterizes Christendom. Success is measured by numerical growth, better programs, and increase in resources – this requires an attractional model. Outreach services and evangelism programs are measured by how many new folks attend church.

A missional model is incarnational. The defining moment of God's coming to the world is the incarnation – that is how God is missional. That is, missional participates in the missio Dei, the mission of God. It was an act of identification with others, taking up residence among others, and revelation for us. Four elements of Incarnation:

1. Presence
2. Proximity
3. Powerlessness
4. Proclamation

Hirsch contends simply this: God's missional move is to find its counterpart in our similar incarnational missional move. And he sees a good theme in 1 Cor 9:22-23: "To the weak I became weak, so that I might win the weak. I have become all things to all people, that I might by all means save some. I do it all for the sake of the gospel, so that I may share in its blessings."

Incarnational ministry means (1) embedding the gospel and (2) deepening the gospel in people groups so they might become God's people.

Another theme: Christology determines missiology; missiology determines ecclesiology. The Church is an element of missiology.

An example of an incarnational missional model is Third Place Communities. First place: home; second place: work; third place: where we spend time off. So, places like pubs, cafes, sports centers … forming communities in such places is the goal of Third Place Communities.

Link

17JulWould Jesus be allowed to be a pastor?

Dan Kimball

"I can assure you of this: if you are associated with the use of beverage alcohol, I think I dare exaggerate not to say that 99% of all doors of ministry in the Southern Baptist Convention will be closed to you."

- Al Mohler, president of The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary

This is such a very strong and interesting statement to make. It is interesting because when you read Scripture, you read that Jesus created wine and Jesus drank wine. Paul instructed Timothy to drink wine. Martin Luther and John Calvin drank beer and wine. C.S. Lewis whom I believe many Southern Baptists respect and quote – drank beer.

I know getting drunk and abusing wine or beer is sin. Alcohol has horribly destroyed people and their families. No question about it. I have first-hand seen the horrible damage that alcohol abuse has done. But so does preventable obesity and people eating until they clog their arteries and have premature heart attacks and die and their families suffer. So does greed and gluttony cause people to suffer in other ways. So does unhealthy marriages that impact children who even grow up in pastors homes or children in homes where anger issues are a problem etc.

There were alcoholics in Jesus day, so if the whole "causing your brother to stumble" argument was valid in regards to how I have heard it used with alcohol (it is not how it was specifically used in the Bible with that verse), then Jesus Himself was causing brothers to stumble at the wedding He created more wine at.

But what is intriguing me about this statement is that with this view, I am wondering – would Jesus then have 99% of the ministry doors shut on Him?

Link

15JulHow to launch new small groups

Greg Ligon

1. Sermon Series Campaigns – New groups are launched that accompany a sermon series that is a good fit for building new communities. This concept is built off the the "40 Days of Purpose" campaigns of a few years ago.

2. Apprentice Leaders – New groups are formed as apprentice leaders "graduate" from a season of walking alongside a seasoned leader.

3. Turbo Groups – These groups are, as the name suggests, groups designed to identify, equip and launch new leaders and the groups they lead in a short time frame. Most of the leaders that participate in this program are seasoned leaders in other areas of church life but new to leading small groups.

4. Connection Events – These events, held as frequently as monthly, are designed to match leaders and participants over a meeting, often including a meal. This strategy is used most to introduce new attenders to small group life.

5. Membership – Churches with a formal membership include introduction of small groups into their process, demonstrating the high value and clear expectations of participation in group life.

6. Dinner Groups – These groups are often originally organized geographically or based on an affinity. In most cases they are intended primarily as a connection point and a "feeder system" into the fuller small group ministry of the church.

7. Reproducing Groups – New groups start when the existing group reaching an agreed upon size and leadership within the existing group surfaces to launch a new group.

How do you launch new groups?

Link

11JulPeople Priority (Part 1)

John Robertson

Leadership can often bring loneliness. There are not many places or people to turn to when you're the one people are looking to for leadership. As leaders we are often tempted to mask the everyday normal struggles every follower of Jesus is challenged with, believing that if we are open and honest about these struggles we will lose our authority or be seen as unworthy of following.  Accompany this with an increasing pressure to fulfill the hundreds of 'laws' and 'best practices' that we should know as a leader and we can easily become immersed in a culture of doing the job, isolated from the very people who we are trying to impact.

After nine years as a Youth and Young Adult Pastor in the same church, my wife and I were called to the mission field in India. Among the many challenges and awesome lessons God taught us through that journey, one stood out more than others. It was the value that the Indian culture places on relationships. As a particularly competitive and task oriented person, I went to India with a very strong value placed on effective use of time for the purposes of productivity. Over the next twelve months, that philosophy was slowly and somewhat reluctantly belted out of me.

The greatest lesson I learnt about my leadership through this experience was this – In ministry people are not a means to an end, they are the end! We have all heard it said, people matter to God and should also matter to us, but how is that reflected in our leadership? All too often we strive for excellence, however many people (including myself) associate excellence with perfection and tasks, and tasks are usually a means to an end. In ministry people are the end.

There are two major issues here for me personally.

The first is that I need to continue to place importance (that is reflected in my schedule) on time spent with people – just doing life with people. Being real and genuine with people. Not necessarily seeing how they might be of value to a goal I'm striving to achieve or a leadership void that needs to be plugged. Jesus constantly challenges me with his priority of stopping, caring, empathising and bringing healing to people. Rushing to the house of Jairus, Jesus still had time to not only heal the woman who had suffered with bleeding for twelve years, he actually spoke into her life words that brought healing too. He was never so task oriented that he failed to minister where it mattered – to people.

…to be continued…

John Robertson is the Executive Pastor at Kenmore Baptist.

10JulForgotten Ways (Part 5)

A book review by Scott McKnight
Anyone who begins a chapter with this quotation from TS Eliot has my attention: "The greatest proof of Christianity for others is not how far a man can logically analyze his reasons for believing, but how far in practice he will stake his life on his belief." So Alan Hirsch quotes Eliot to open chapter 4 of The Forgotten Ways.

Questions for the day: Is consumerism the biggest threat to discipleship today? What is the best way to make disciples?

This isn't just about the old debate about orthodoxy and orthopraxy but about the stunning impact Christian integrity, love, and holiness can have on those who observe them. In other words, it is a comment about the significance discipleship needs to play in "church programming" (to use an expression Hirsch might wrinkle his nose at!). So, the second element of mDNA – missional DNA – is discipleship.

Overall this chp had lots of good ideas, but it wandered around way too much between discipleship and leadership and consumerism. Still, I want to put on the blog today the central ideas of this chp.

First, Hirsch thinks the major challenge facing the church to day is consumerism – it has infiltrated everything, including identity, purpose, meaning, and community. He lists the rise of capitalism, the nation-state, and science and how these conditions have turned religion into a privatized, personal, non-public exercise. And the pervasiveness of consumerism has made much of Christianity consumeristic. And medium has overwhelmed the message.

Consumerism of our day and discipleship of Jesus' day are incompatible. And, "if we don't disciple people, the culture sure will" (111). We have two options:

1. Redeem consumerism.
2. Reject consumerism.

A model of rejection is Rutba House's new monasticism.

Second, he thinks the point of it all is to make "little Jesuses" in every neighborhood. He sees this as the Conspiracy of the Little Jesus. This is a good section, but what I've said gets to the heart of it.

Third, he deals with leadership and how we train people to be leaders (and this is part of how he sees discipleship). He posits the Academy over against the Apostolic Genius. Here he's picking on seminaries. In the Academy approach, which is "thinking our way into a new way of acting" (Hellenistic approach), the person is yanked from society and taught abstract things and re-socialized into a new way of life and these folks then have trouble adjusting and then impose the Hellenistic approach on the local church.

The Apostolic Genius approach was from the Hebrew concept where we are involved in "acting our way into a new way of thinking." It leads to new thinking and new behavior, while the Hellenistic model leads to new thinking with old behavior. And he's got a cool chart to show this.

I doubt Hirsch has read much of Plato or Aristotle, for they weren't simply abstract guys, and I don't think the Hebrew system is simply doing leading to thinking – but the simplisticity of his thesis isn't the thing to pick on.

The issue here is simple: What is the best way to disciple others? How do we get it done? What's involved? What are the goals?

Clearly, anyone who has done it knows that an "outcome based theory of education" proves that we are concerned in the Church of leading others into a life of discipleship and that can only come about if we know the behaviors and thinking patterns necessary for such to come about – and then creating a "program" or "model" or "system" that leads to that. And it won't occur simply in a classroom. It must occur in both the classroom – learning things – and in the rough and tumble of actual being and doing. Reading a good book on marriage helps most marriages; living daily with another in love will transcend that book into living realities.




Blogroll

Recent Listening